SDXL_TI_my_eyes_are_bleeding_2.0.safetensors

0 MB · SafeTensor

Nangangailangan ng membership

<neg-eyebleach3-xl>

V.3.0 - Negative Embedding ( Not a LoRA! ) Just wanted to get this out because i will probably use it for some pictures. Needed it to be a bit more aggressive cause i know the effect it has, especially in combination with some LoRAs that have tendencies to add fog, haze, washed out colors and clutter. Sometimes that is a wanted effect and adds atmosphere and some of the examples i posted actually look better without it imho. I know those pictures aren't the highest quality in the first place, just wanted to show the effect. The main reason to do this one was because of a test i did with a LoRA that creates a really strange style ( might going to release, depends ) which i combined with several other LoRAs. Wasn't so successful at first cause one LoRA always overpowered the other and less strength for one meant the style or effect was gone... for some reason though this embedding made the combination much clearer. Have to say though that was a pretty "push it to the limit" test where i knew the outcome would be terrible. Like with pretty much all of my stuff, it's more based on luck then anything else. What i can say though is you might wanna lower the CFG scale if you use this one. I got better results with a lower CFG and by the look of it ( and pure speculation ) it's almost like it has the effect of a higher CFG scale and going to high might burn your retina. - Like last time, first picture is always the one without the Embedding - Kinda works on Pony, but with less effect. Produces funny things sometimes, especially if you don't use the score_up stuff, which actually forces particular styles that may all look the same, but not using it tends to also fkup anatomy. V2.0 - Negative Embedding ( Not a LoRA! ) Behold this massive 5kb file that almost made me buy a whole data center so i can store this behemoth. Maybe i should have posted this thing separately so it isn't in the LoRA category but... mehh. Could only select LoRA as an option while uploading the file. First time trying to use textual inversion. Even though i like the LoRA version, because it has some weird effects, i was still looking for a solution for what i was really trying to do. Embedding seems like the better solution, even though it was for some reason harder to train ( and used more VRAM ) Now it kinda does what it should do, like getting rid of some annoying stuff ( like my arch enemies haze, fog, and artifacts... for the most part), make the images clearer, more contrast and for some reason it also adds random details, like the LoRA does. I tested a few models and some have some weird reactions. I used a, even by my standards, pretty weird prompt that had an idea but it was impossible to produce anything useful. As soon as i used this Embedding it was like the difference between night and day. The image changed completely and was following the prompt a lot more. It was still a mess but i didn't expect something like this. Again, i will use this thing for now to see what it really can do. Also will test more TI stuff. - The first image is always the one without the Embedding, same seed, same model. - The one with the flower really shows some of the strange behavior V1.0 Nothing to see here, literally. The images this was trained on had an idea behind them, but where all a blurry and noisy over-saturated mess with scratches, blotches and over the top lighting effects like lens flare, chromatic aberration and caustics... and a lot of other things. It's just an experiment that went into a completely different direction then original planed. I just post it here because i will probably use this LoRA for some images and if someone is interested to recreate something you might need this. Also, images using this will be cross posted here i guess. Don't ask what it does because i'm not quite sure yet, but i got some ( for whatever reason ) positive results, even though it was meant for the complete opposite... or let's say as a helper. Before someone goes like "Uhh, mystery LoRA clickbait", it somehow enhances effects of other LoRAs and makes everything a bit sharper and realistic ( or blurry and unrealistic ). It also can change something completely from strength 1 - 1.2 and negative strength to like -0.5. I don't know if that's just a placebo effect, but tests so far were pretty consistent with the same prompt and seed. One might assume setting a negative strength would be better, but it's the complete opposite. Actually extremely baffling. Will be pretty much of no use to anyone but me for quite some time, till i figure out what to do. If it doesn't do what i assume it does it's gonna get deleted. - Hmm, playing a bit with it and after testing with the same seed but different strengths from positive to negative it went either in a total different direction, stayed within what was prompted but with mayor differences or it helped actually following the prompt, even crazy stuff.

SHA256

981A0FF183B1AF2BBCF49A1A2BBDE59290049ECCBDC20FB2497EC41003CBD10F

ModelTrends.ai Model ID

#2497

Sampler

Euler a

Steps

25

Guidance

7

Seed

680848552

Laki

832x1216

Clip skip

2

Ginamit na weight

1

Sampler

DPM++ 2M Karras

Guidance

1

Seed

1

Laki

832x1216

Clip skip

2

Ginamit na weight

1

Sampler

DPM++ 2M

Steps

25

Guidance

4.5

Seed

20870372

Laki

832x1216

Clip skip

2

Ginamit na weight

1

Sampler

DPM++ 2M

Steps

25

Guidance

5

Seed

567944651

Laki

832x1216

Clip skip

2

Ginamit na weight

1

Sampler

Euler a

Steps

25

Guidance

4.5

Seed

1301679889

Laki

832x1216

Clip skip

2

Ginamit na weight

1

Sampler

DPM++ 2M

Steps

25

Guidance

4

Seed

1939803603

Laki

832x1216

Clip skip

2

Ginamit na weight

1

Sampler

DPM++ 3M SDE Karras

Steps

32

Guidance

4

Seed

2578553112

Laki

768x1152

Sampler

DPM++ 3M SDE Karras

Steps

30

Guidance

4

Seed

3825383120

Laki

768x1152